PubMed Posts

Background: Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is a complex surgical procedure involving en-bloc resection of the parietal and visceral pleura, lung, pericardium, and ipsilateral diaphragm. Small case series of pleural-based sarcoma of predominantly pediatric patients suggest EPP may be a life-prolonging surgical option. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of adults who underwent EPP at a specialized sarcoma center.

Methods: Clinicopathologic variables, surgical details, and follow-up information were extracted for patients undergoing EPP for pleural-based sarcoma between August 2017 and December 2020. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the date of EPP. Secondary outcomes were disease-free interval (DFI) prior to EPP, and early and late postoperative complications.

Results: Eight patients were identified, seven with soft tissue sarcoma and one with bone sarcoma. Patients had either localized disease with a primary thoracic sarcoma, sarcoma recurrent to the thorax, or de novo metastatic disease. All patients underwent resection of their pleural-based sarcoma by an experienced cardiothoracic surgeon, and some patients had pre or postoperative treatment. The perioperative morbidity was comparable with previously published reports of EPP performed in mesothelioma patients. At median follow-up of 22.5 months, median EFS was 6.0 months and OS was 20.7 months. Six patients (75%) had disease recurrence; five (62.5%) died of progressive disease. Two patients (25%) had not recurred: one died of a radiation-related esophageal rupture, and one was alive with no evidence of disease at 37.0 months. Characteristics of those with the longest EFS included low-grade histology and achieving a metabolic response to preoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions: In adults with pleural-based sarcoma, EPP is rarely curative but appears to be a feasible salvage procedure when performed at specialized centers. Patient selection is critical with strong consideration given to multimodal therapy to optimize patient outcomes. In the absence of a confirmed response to neoadjuvant treatment, long term survival is poor and EPP should not be recommended

Objectives: The frequency of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MVS) has steadily increased over the last decades and therefore surgeons are now encountering an increasing number of patients requiring mitral valve (MV) reoperations post-minimally invasive MVS. The aim of this study was to analyse the early postoperative outcomes and the long-term survival in patients who undergo reoperative MVS following previous minimally invasive surgery.

Methods: Patients who underwent redo MVS following prior minimally invasive MVS between January 2002 and December 2021 were included in our analysis. Study data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and long-term survival.

Results: Among the 187 included patients, 34 (18.2%) underwent repeat MV repair and 153 (81.8%) MV replacement. The median age was 66 years (interquartile range 56-74) and 80 (42.8%) patients were female. Redo MVS was performed through median sternotomy in 169 patients (90.4%). A total of 77 (41.2%) patients had additional concomitant procedures. The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (1-5). The 30-day mortality was 6.4% (12/187). Estimated survival at 5 and 12 years was 61.8% and 38.3%, respectively. Preoperative stroke (hazard ratio 3.28, 95% confidence interval 1.37-7.85, P = 0.007) as well as infective endocarditis (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.11, P = 0.021) were independent predictors of long-term mortality.

Conclusions: Redo MVS following prior minimally invasive MVS can be performed safely with low early perioperative mortality and acceptable long-term survival. Preoperative stroke, infective endocarditis and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery are independent predictors of long-term mortality.

Objective: Randomized evidence suggests a high risk of pacemaker implantation for patients undergoing mitral valve (MV) surgery with concomitant tricuspid valve repair (cTVR). We investigated the impact of cTVR on outcomes in the Mini-Mitral International Registry.

Methods: From 2015 to 2021, 7513 patients underwent minimally invasive MV with or without cTVR in 17 international centers (MV: n = 5609, cTVR: n = 1113). Propensity matching generated 1110 well-balanced pairs. Multivariable analysis was applied.

Results: Patients with cTVR were older and had more comorbidities. Propensity matching eliminated most differences except for more TR in patients who underwent cTVR (77.2% vs 22.1% MV, P < .001). Mean matched age was 71 years, and 45% were male. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II was still 2.68% (interquartile range [IQR], 0.80-2.63) vs 1.9% (IQR, 1.12-3.9) in matched MV (P < .001). MV replacement (30%) and atrial fibrillation surgery (32%) were similar in both groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass (161 minutes [IQR, 133-203] vs MV: 130 minutes [IQR, 103-166]; P < .001) and crossclamp times (93 minutes [IQR, 66-123] vs MV: 83 minutes [IQR, 64-107]; P < .001) were longer with cTVR. Although in-hospital mortality was similar (cTVR: 3.3% vs MV: 2.2%; P = .5), postoperative pacemaker implantations (9% vs MV: 5.8%; P = .02), low cardiac output syndrome (7.7% vs MV: 4.4%; P = .02), and acute kidney injury (13.8% vs MV: 10%; P = .01) were more frequent with cTVR. cTVR eliminated relevant TR in most patients (greater-than-moderate TR: 6.8%). Multivariable analysis identified MV replacement, atrial fibrillation, and cTVR as risk factors of postoperative pacemaker implantation.

Conclusions: cTVR in minimally invasive MV surgery is an independent risk factor for pacemaker implantation in this international registry. It is also associated with more bleeding, low output syndrome, and acute kidney injury. It remains unclear whether technical or patient factors (or both) explain these differences.

Importance: Recent European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) guidelines highlighted some concerns about the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic stenosis. Quantification of these biases has not been previously performed.

Objective: To assess whether randomization protects RCTs comparing TAVI and SAVR from biases other than nonrandom allocation.

Data sources: A systematic review of the literature between January 1, 2007, and June 6, 2022, on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. Specialist websites were also checked for unpublished data.

Study selection: The study included RCTs with random allocation to TAVI or SAVR with a maximum 5-year follow-up.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was performed by 2 independent investigators following the PRISMA guidelines. A random-effects meta-analysis was used for quantifying pooled rates and differential rates between treatments of deviation from random assigned treatment (DAT), loss to follow-up, and receipt of additional treatments.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were the proportion of DAT, loss to follow-up, and patients who were provided additional treatments and myocardial revascularization, together with their ratio between treatments. The measures were the pooled overall proportion of the primary outcomes and the risk ratio (RR) in the TAVI vs SAVR groups.

Results: The search identified 8 eligible trials including 8849 participants randomly assigned to undergo TAVI (n = 4458) or SAVR (n = 4391). The pooled proportion of DAT among the sample was 4.2% (95% CI, 3.0%-5.6%), favoring TAVI (pooled RR vs SAVR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.36; P < .001). The pooled proportion of loss to follow-up was 4.8% (95% CI, 2.7%-7.3%). Meta-regression showed a significant association between the proportion of participants lost to follow-up and follow-up time (slope, 0.042; 95% CI, 0.017-0.066; P < .001). There was an imbalance of loss to follow-up favoring TAVI (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55; P < .001). The pooled proportion of patients who had additional procedures was 10.4% (95% CI, 4.4%-18.5%): 4.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-9.3%) in the TAVI group and 16.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-28.1%) in the SAVR group (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.50; P < .001). The imbalance between groups also favored TAVI for additional myocardial revascularization (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that, in RCTs comparing TAVI vs SAVR, there are substantial proportions of DAT, loss to follow-up, and additional procedures together with systematic selective imbalance in the same direction characterized by significantly lower proportions of patients undergoing TAVI that might affect internal validity.

Objective: During a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) procedure, intraprocedural complications that are manageable only by conversion to emergency open-heart surgery (E-OHS) occasionally occur. Contemporary data on the incidence and outcome of TAVI patients undergoing E-OHS are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate early and midterm outcomes following E-OHS of patients undergoing TAVI in a large tertiary care centre with immediate surgical backup availability for all TAVI procedures over a 15-year period.

Methods: Data from all patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI between 2006 and 2020 at the Heart Centre Leipzig were analysed. The study time was divided into 3 periods: 2006-2010 (P1), 2011-2015 (P2) and 2016-2020 (P3). Patients were grouped according to their surgical risk (high risk: EuroSCORE II ≥ 6%; low/intermediate risk: EuroSCORE II <6%). Primary outcomes were intraprocedural and in-hospital death and 1-year survival.

Results: During the study period, a total of 6903 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI. Among them, 74 (1.1%) required E-OHS [high risk, n = 66 (89.2%); low/intermediate risk, n = 8 (10.8%)]. The rate of patients requiring E-OHS was 3.5% (20/577 patients), 1.8% (35/1967 patients) and 0.4% (19/4359 patients) in study periods P1 to P3, respectively (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who had E-OHS who were low/intermediate risk increased considerably over time (P1:0%; P28.6%; P3:26.3%; P = 0.077). Intraprocedural deaths occurred in 10 patients (13.5%), all of whom were high-risk. In-hospital mortality was 62.1% in high-risk patients and 12.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (P = 0.007). One-year survival was 37.8% in all patients undergoing E-OHS, 31.8% in high-risk patients and 87.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (log-rank P = 0.002).

Conclusions: In-hospital and 1-year survival rates following E-OHS are higher in low/intermediate risk than in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI. An on-site cardiac surgical department with immediately available E-OHS capabilities is an important component of the TAVI team.

Background: The efficacy of different cardioplegia solutions on outcomes of complex cardiac operations such as triple valve surgery (TVS) is scarce. Here we compared the outcomes in TVS patients receiving either crystalloid (Bretschneider) or blood (Calafiore) cardioplegia.

Methods: Screening of our institutional database with prospectively entered data identified 471 consecutive patients (mean age 70.3 ± 9.2 years; 50.9% male), who underwent TVS (replacement or repair of aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve) between December 1994 and January 2013. In 277 patients, cardiac arrest was induced with HTK-Bretschneider solution (HTK, n = 277, 58.8%), whereas 194 received cold blood cardioplegia (BCP) according to Calafiore (n = 194, 41.2%). Comparisons of perioperative and follow up outcomes were made between cardioplegia groups.

Results: Preoperative patient characteristics and comorbidities were equally balanced between groups. 30-days mortality was similar between groups (HTK: 16.2%; BCP: 18.2%; p = 0.619). Incidence of the cumulative endpoint (30days mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmia, low cardiac output syndrome or need for permanent pacemaker implantation) was also comparable (HTK: 47.6%; BCP: 54.8%, p = 0.149). In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <40%), 30days mortality was higher in the HTK group (HTK 18/71 22.5%; BCP 5/50 10%; p = 0.037). Five-year survival was similar between groups (52 ± 6% for HTK and 55 ± 5% for BCP patients). In-Hospital mortality was best predicted by length of surgery and reperfusion ratio. Decreased age, shorter bypass time, preserved LVEF and concomitant surgical procedures have been found to be protective from long-term mortality.

Conclusions: Myocardial protection with HTK shows equivalent outcomes compared to BCP during TVS. Patients with reduced left ventricular function may benefit from BCP during TVS.

Objective: Minimally invasive approaches are being used increasingly in cardiac surgery and applied in a wider range of operations, including complex aortic procedures. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of a partial upper sternotomy approach for isolated elective aortic root replacement (a modified Bentall procedure).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 768 consecutive patients who had undergone isolated Bentall surgery between January 2000 and January 2021 at our institution, with the exclusion of re-operations, endocarditis, acute aortic dissections, and root replacement with major concomitant procedures such as multi-valve or coronary bypass surgery. A total of 98 patients were operated on via partial sternotomy (PS) and were matched 2:1 to 196 patients operated on via full sternotomy (FS).

Results: The procedure time was 12 min longer in the PS group (205 min vs. 192.5 min in the FS group, p = 0.002), however, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were comparable between groups. Eight PS-procedures were converted to full sternotomy, predominantly for bleeding complications (n = 6). Re-exploration for acute bleeding was necessary in 11% of the PS group and 4.1% of the FS group (p = 0.02). Five FS patients and none in the PS group required emergency coronary bypass grafting for postoperative coronary obstruction (p = 0.2). PS patients were hospitalized for a significantly shorter period (9.5 days vs. 10.5 days in the FS group, respectively). There were no significant differences regarding in-hospital (p = 0.4) and mid-term mortality (p = 0.73), as well as for other perioperative complications.

Conclusions: Performing Bentall operations via partial upper sternotomy is associated with similar perfusion and cross-clamp times, as well as overall mortality, when compared to a full sternotomy approach. A low threshold for conversion to full sternotomy should be accepted if limited access proves insufficient for the handling of intraoperative complications, particularly bleeding.

Surgical and interventional repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms improve survival significantly compared to the natural history of the disease. However, both strategies are associated with a substantial risk of spinal cord ischemia, which has been reported to occur-even in contemporary series by expert centers-in up to 12% of patients, depending on the extent of the disease. Following improved neurological outcomes after staged approaches in extensive clinical and long-term large animal studies, and the description of the “collateral network”, the concept of “Minimally Invasive Staged Segmental Artery Coil Embolization” (MIS²ACE) was introduced by Etz et al. This concept of priming the collateral network in order to improve spinal cord blood supply showed promising experimental and early clinical outcomes, and consequently led to the initiation of the randomized controlled multicenter PAPAartis trial (Paraplegia Prevention in Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Thoracoabdominal Staging). This Keynote Lecture describes the background and rationale for this trial and gives an update on the current status.

No abstract available

Objectives: Patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been repeatedly suggested to have worse clinical outcomes compared to patients without DM. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on 1-year clinical outcomes after isolated CABG.

Methods: The European DuraGraft registry included 1130 patients (44.6%) with and 1402 (55.4%) patients without diabetes mellitus undergoing isolated CABG. Intra-operatively, all free venous and arterial grafts were treated with an endothelial damage inhibitor. Primary end-point in this analysis was the incidence of a major adverse cardiac event, a composite of all-cause death, repeat-revascularization or myocardial-infarction at 1-year post CABG. To balance between differences in baseline characteristics (n = 1,072 patients in each group) propensity score matching was used. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events.

Results: Diabetic patients had a higher cardiovascular risk-profile and EuroScore II with overall more comorbidities. Patients were comparable in regard to surgical techniques and completeness of revascularization. At 1-year, diabetics had a higher major adverse cardiac event rate (7.9% vs 5.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.43 (95% CI 1.05-1.95), p = 0.02), driven by increased rates of death (5.6% vs 3.5%, HR 1.61 (95% CI 1.10-2.36), p = 0.01) and myocardial infarction (2.8% vs 1.4%, HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.12-3.53) p = 0.02). Following propensity matching, no statistically significant difference was found for major adverse cardiac events (7.1% vs 5.7%, HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.87-1.74) p = 0.23) or its components. Age, critical operative state, extracardiac arteriopathy, ejection-fraction ≤50% and left-main disease, but not diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictors for major adverse cardiac events.

Conclusions: In this study, 1-year outcomes in diabetics undergoing isolated CABG was comparable to patients without diabetes mellitus.