PubMed Posts

Background: Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery (RMVS) is becoming an increasingly performed procedure in cardiac surgery, however, its true safety and efficacy compared to the gold standard conventional sternotomy approach [conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery (CSMVS)] remains debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive analysis of all available literature comparing RMVS to CSMVS.

Methods: An electronic search of five databases was performed to identify all relevant studies comparing RMVS to CSMVS. Pre-defined primary outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and re-operation for bleeding. Secondary outcomes of interest included cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

Results: The search strategy identified fourteen studies qualifying for inclusion in this meta-analysis comparing RMVS to CSMVS. The outcomes of 6,341 patients (2,804 RMVS and 3,537 CSMVS) were included. RMVS had significantly lower mortality when compared to CSMVS group in both the unmatched [odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.57; P<0.001] and matched cohorts (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.80; P=0.01). There was no significant difference in rates of CVA or re-operation for bleeding between the two groups in either the entire included cohort or matched patients. CSMVS had significantly shorter cross clamp time by 28 minutes (95% CI: 19.30-37.32; P<0.001) and CPB time by 49 minutes (95% CI: 36.16-61.01; P<0.001) which remained significantly shorter in the matched cohorts. RMVS had shorter ICU [mean difference (MD) 26 hours; 95% CI: -34.31 to -18.52; P<0.001] and hospital LOS (MD 2 days; 95% CI: -2.66 to -1.37; P<0.001), which were again both significantly shorter in the matched cohort. RMVS group also had fewer RBC transfusions (OR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28-0.70; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Current evidence on comparative outcomes of RMVS and CSMVS is limited with only low-quality studies currently available. This present meta-analysis suggests that RMVS may have lower mortality and shorter ICU and hospital LOS, however CSMVS may be associated with significantly shorter cross clamp and CPB times. Further analysis of high-quality studies with randomized data is required to verify these results

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the need for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SuRD-AVR) in the context of a progress report from a large multicenter international registry (SURD-IR).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4,166 patients who underwent SuRD-AVR between 2008 and 2019. The primary outcome was the need for PPI before discharge. The study population was analyzed separately according to the implanted prostheses (Su cohort and RD cohort). Each cohort was divided into two groups based on the operation date: an early group (“EG” = 2008-2016) and a late group (“LG” = 2017-2019).

Results: The rate of PPI decreased significantly in the Su cohort over time (EG = 10.8% vs LG = 6.3%, p < 0.001). In the Su cohort, a decrease in age, risk profile, and incidence of bicuspid aortic valve, increased use of anterior right thoracotomy, reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass time and of associated procedures, and more frequent use of smaller prostheses were observed over time. In the RD cohort, the rate of PPI was stable over time (EG = 8.8% vs LG = 9.3%, p = 0.8). In this cohort, a younger age, lower risk profile, and higher incidence of concomitant septal myectomy were observed over time.

Conclusions: Our analysis showed a significant decrease in the PPI rate in patients who underwent Su-AVR over time. Patient selection as well as surgical improvements and a more accurate sizing could be correlated with this phenomenon. The RD cohort revealed no significant differences either in patient’s characteristics or in PPI rate between the two time periods.

Heritable aortic aneurysm is an increasingly recognized cause of morbidity and mortality. Whilst Marfan syndrome (MFS) is well-known, the clinical presentation and prognosis of more newly described genetic syndromes is less familiar to clinicians. There is a particular lack of knowledge regarding clinical outcomes for non-syndromal heritable aortic disease. This study investigated the presentation, clinical course and survival of patients with syndromal [Loeys-Dietz, aneurysm-osteoarthritis, and aneurysm-cerebral arteriopathy (ACTA2) syndrome] and non-syndromal heritable aortic disease in comparison to MFS. The study group includes 536 individuals (283 Marfan, 176 non-syndromal heritable aortopathy, 36 aneurysm-osteoarthritis, 32 Loeys-Dietz, and 9 ACTA2 aneurysm) enrolled in a longitudinal clinical follow-up between 1990 and 2022. Age at diagnosis differed between groups: Marfan = 22.0 ± 16.6; Loeys-Dietz = 29.6 ± 21.5; aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 36.4 ± 18.8; ACTA2 aneurysm = 43.4 ± 18.6; non-syndromal heritable aortopathy = 47.2 ± 16.6 years (p < 0.001). Aortic dissection was the presenting event in 8% individuals with Marfan compared to 27% with non-syndromal heritable aortopathy and 34% with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up duration for the group was 16.4 years (range 0.2-30 years) and 74 individuals died during follow-up (Marfan = 52, Loeys-Dietz = 6, aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 4, ACTA2 aneurysm = 1, heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 11). At 10 years follow-up, actuarial mean survivals were: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 77.5 ± 10.4%; Loeys-Dietz = 90.0 ± 6.8%; Marfan = 94.6 ± 1.4%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 95.9 ± 2.1% (NS). There were 60 aortic dissections (24 Type A, 36 Type B) during follow-up. At 10 years, survival free of dissection was comparable between groups: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 90.7 ± 6.4%; Loeys-Dietz = 94.4 ± 5.4%; Marfan = 96.1 ± 1.2%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 93.9 ± 2.3%, with similar findings at 20 years. Prophylactic aortic surgery was a first event during follow-up for 196 individuals (ACTA2 aneurysm = 3; aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 10; Loeys-Dietz = 19; Marfan = 119; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 45). A second surgical intervention was required in 45 individuals and a third intervention in 21 individuals. At 10 years follow-up, survival free of surgery differed between groups: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 68.5 ± 10.1%; Loeys-Dietz = 40.8 ± 11.2%; Marfan = 75.5 ± 2.7%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 63.8 ± 4.7% (p < 0.001). At 20 years follow-up mean survival free of surgery was: aneurysm-osteoarthritis = 26.6 ± 14.7%; Loeys-Dietz = 9.1 ± 8.2%; Marfan = 57.2 ± 3.4%; heritable non-syndromal aortopathy = 41.6 ± 8.2% (p < 0.001). Diagnosis of newer syndromic and non-syndromal heritable aortopathies is delayed compared to MFS, with associated complications of presentation with aortic dissection. Survival of individuals enrolled in follow-up surveillance is comparable between different genetic aortopathies, however aortic dissections still occur and need for surgical intervention is high.

No abstract available

No abstract available

Surgical myectomy remains the time-honored primary treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with drug refractory limiting symptoms due to LV outflow obstruction. Based on >50 years experience, surgery reliably reverses disabling heart failure by permanently abolishing mechanical outflow impedance and mitral regurgitation, with normalization of LV pressures and preserved systolic function. A consortium of 10 international currently active myectomy centers report about 11,000 operations, increasing significantly in number over the most recent 15 years. Performed in experienced multidisciplinary institutions, perioperative mortality for myectomy has declined to 0.6%, becoming one of the safest currently performed open-heart procedures. Extended myectomy relieves symptoms in >90% of patients by ≥ 1 NYHA functional class, returning most to normal daily activity, and also with a long-term survival benefit; concomitant Cox-Maze procedure can reduce the number of atrial fibrillation episodes. Surgery, preferably performed in high volume clinical environments, continues to flourish as a guideline-based and preferred high benefit: low treatment risk option for adults and children with drug refractory disabling symptoms from obstruction, despite prior challenges: higher operative mortality/skepticism in 1960s/1970s; dual-chamber pacing in 1990s, alcohol ablation in 2000s, and now introduction of novel negative inotropic drugs potentially useful for symptom management.

No abstract available

Background: Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root. Although more patients have undergone valve sparing procedures over the past decades, the classic ‘modified Bentall technique’ remains a valid option, particularly for patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We aimed to compare the results of elective and emergency modified Bentall procedures in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing either elective or emergency modified Bentall procedures between 2000 and 2018 and identified 827 elective cases (44% BAV) and 258 emergency cases (15% BAV). Analysis of intra- and postoperative outcomes and early mortality was performed. Due to inequality of the groups, a matching analysis was performed.

Results: We found BAV patients to be significantly younger (elective: 58±18 vs. 65±14, P<0.001; emergency: 49±17 vs. 62±19, P<0.001) and healthier at time of surgery. In the AADA cohort, malperfusion rate was not different between bicuspid and tricuspid patients, however bicuspid AADA patients presented more often with an entry in the aortic root. After matching, procedure times and early outcomes did not differ between the groups, except for significantly higher rates of respiratory failure in elective TAV patients (10% vs. 5%, P=0.033). The 30-day mortality was 2% in elective cases and 22% in emergency AADA surgery. A subgroup analysis of elective patients with aortic diameter <55 mm also showed excellent outcomes.

Conclusions: After adjustment for preoperative inequalities, no differences in early mortality and outcomes were found between bicuspid and tricuspid patients receiving elective or emergency modified Bentall surgery.

No abstract available

Abstract