PubMed Posts

No abstract available

Background: Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root. Although more patients have undergone valve sparing procedures over the past decades, the classic ‘modified Bentall technique’ remains a valid option, particularly for patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We aimed to compare the results of elective and emergency modified Bentall procedures in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing either elective or emergency modified Bentall procedures between 2000 and 2018 and identified 827 elective cases (44% BAV) and 258 emergency cases (15% BAV). Analysis of intra- and postoperative outcomes and early mortality was performed. Due to inequality of the groups, a matching analysis was performed.

Results: We found BAV patients to be significantly younger (elective: 58±18 vs. 65±14, P<0.001; emergency: 49±17 vs. 62±19, P<0.001) and healthier at time of surgery. In the AADA cohort, malperfusion rate was not different between bicuspid and tricuspid patients, however bicuspid AADA patients presented more often with an entry in the aortic root. After matching, procedure times and early outcomes did not differ between the groups, except for significantly higher rates of respiratory failure in elective TAV patients (10% vs. 5%, P=0.033). The 30-day mortality was 2% in elective cases and 22% in emergency AADA surgery. A subgroup analysis of elective patients with aortic diameter <55 mm also showed excellent outcomes.

Conclusions: After adjustment for preoperative inequalities, no differences in early mortality and outcomes were found between bicuspid and tricuspid patients receiving elective or emergency modified Bentall surgery.

No abstract available

Abstract

Objective: Infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Staphylococcus species (spp.) is believed to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. We hypothesize that Staphylococcus spp. are more virulent compared with other commonly causative bacteria of IE with regard to short-term and long-term mortality.

Background: It remains unclear if patients suffering from IE due to Staphylococcus spp. should be referred for surgical treatment earlier than other IE patients to avoid septic embolism and to optimize perioperative outcomes.

Materials and methods: The database of the CAMPAIGN registry, comprising 4917 consecutive patients undergoing heart valve surgery, was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups with regard to the identified microorganisms: Staphylococcus group and the non- Staphylococcus group. The non- Staphylococcus group was subdivided for further analyses: Streptococcus group, Enterococcus group, and all other bacteria groups.

Results: The respective mortality rates at 30 days (18.7% vs 11.8%; P <0.001), 1 year (24.7% vs 17.7%; P <0.001), and 5 years (32.2% vs 24.5%; P <0.001) were significantly higher in Staphylococcus patients (n=1260) compared with the non- Staphylococcus group (n=1787). Multivariate regression identified left ventricular ejection fraction <30% ( P <0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( P =0.045), renal insufficiency ( P =0.002), Staphylococcus spp. ( P =0.032), and Streptococcus spp. ( P =0.013) as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were identified as: age ( P <0.001), female sex ( P =0.018), diabetes ( P =0.018), preoperative stroke ( P =0.039), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( P =0.001), preoperative dialysis ( P <0.001), and valve vegetations ( P =0.004).

Conclusions: Staphylococcus endocarditis is associated with an almost twice as high 30-day mortality and significantly inferior long-term outcome compared with IE by other commonly causative bacteria. Patients with Staphylococcus infection are more often female and critically ill, with >50% of these patients suffering from clinically relevant septic embolism. Early diagnosis and referral to a specialized center for surgical treatment are strongly recommended to reduce the incidence of preoperative deterioration and stroke due to septic embolism.

Objectives: Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is considered an independent risk factor for clinical events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We have conducted a subgroup analysis of the multicentre European DuraGraft registry to investigate clinical event-rates at 1-year in patients with and without LMCAD undergoing isolated CABG in contemporary practice.

Methods: Patients undergoing isolated CABG were selected. The primary end-point was the incidence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization (RR) at 1-year. The secondary end-point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as MACE plus stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance for differences in baseline characteristics.

Results: LMCAD was present in 1,033 (41.2%) and absent in 1,477 (58.8%) patients. At 1-year, the MACE rate was higher for LMCAD patients (8.2% vs 5.1%, p = 0.002) driven by higher rates of death (5.4% vs 3.4%, p = 0.016), MI (3.0% vs 1.3%, p = 0.002) and numerically higher rates of RR (2.8% vs 1.8%, p = 0.13). The incidence of MACCE was 8.8% vs 6.6%, p = 0.043 with a stroke rate of 1.0% and 2.4%, p = 0.011, for LMCAD and non-LMCAD group, respectively. After PSM, the MACE rate was 8.0% vs 5.2%, p = 0.015. The incidence of death was 5.1% vs 3.7%, p = 0.10, MI 3.0% vs 1.4%, p = 0.020, and RR was 2.7% vs 1.6%, p = 0.090, for the LMCAD and non-LMCAD group, respectively. Less strokes occurred in LMCAD patients (1.0% vs 2.4%, p = 0.017). The MACCE rate was not different: 8.5% vs 6.7%, p = 0.12.

Conclusions: In this large registry, LMCAD was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for MACE after isolated CABG. Conversely, the risk of stroke was lower in LMCAD patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02922088.

Background: Guidelines on the management of aortic aneurysm disease do not account for sex differences regarding surgical procedures on the proximal aorta, although faster aneurysm growth, increased rupture risk, and higher postoperative mortality have been found in women. We therefore analyzed outcome differences between men and women receiving operations on the proximal aorta.

Methods: A total of 1773 patients underwent nonemergency surgical procedures on the aortic valve (AV) and proximal aorta at our institution between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 772 patients (21.8% women) received a Bentall procedure, 349 (20.3% women) had AV-sparing root replacement, and 652 (31.1% women) underwent AV and supracommissural ascending aorta replacement. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and midterm survival.

Results: When assessing sex-related differences within the entire group of patients that received an operation on the proximal aorta, women were found to be older, had a lower body mass index, and were smokers less often. Despite shorter procedural times, median ventilation times and intensive care unit length of stay were longer in women. In-house mortality was also higher in women (3.6% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed age (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3 per 5 years added; P < .001), female sex (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.8; P = .02), and urgent surgery (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2-7.3; P = .01) as independent risk factors for in-house death. Midterm survival was lower for women in the entire cohort (P = .02) and particularly within the Bentall subgroup (P = .004).

Conclusions: Female sex is an independent risk factor for operative mortality in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery but is currently not addressed in guidelines. More research should focus on etiology and prevention of these worse outcomes in female patients.

Objectives: To compare procedural and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing sutureless (Perceval, Livanova PLC, London, UK) and rapid deployment (Intuity Elite, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) aortic valve replacement (group 1) versus sutured aortic valve replacement (group 2).

Methods: Patients receiving isolated aortic valve replacement between 2014 and 2020 were analysed using data from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry. Patients in group 1 and group 2 were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio.

Results: A total of 7708 patients were included in the study. After matching, 2 groups of 2643 each were created. Patients in group 1 were more likely to undergo minimally invasive approaches and were associated with shorter operative times when compared with group 2. Overall in-hospital mortality was similar between groups. While an increased risk of stroke was observed in group 1 in the first study period (2014-2016; relative risk 3.76, P < 0.001), no difference was found in more recent year period (relative risk 1.66, P = 0.08; P for heterogeneity 0.003). Group 1 was associated with reduced rates of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, atrial fibrillation and mild aortic regurgitation. New pacemaker implant was three-fold higher in group 1.

Conclusions: Our findings showed significant differences in procedural and clinical outcomes between the study groups. These results suggest that sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement should be considered as part of a comprehensive valve programme. The knowledge of the respective post-aortic valve replacement benefits for different valve technologies may result in patient-tailored valve selection with improved clinical outcomes.

The absence of an accepted gold standard to estimate volume status is an obstacle for optimal management of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The applicability of the analogue mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsa) as a surrogate of the mean circulatory pressure to estimate volume status for patients with LVADs has not been investigated. Variability of flows generated by the Impella CP, a temporary LVAD, should have no physiological impact on fluid status. This translational interventional ovine study demonstrated that Pmsa did not change with variable circulatory flows induced by a continuous flow LVAD (the average dynamic increase in Pmsa of 0.20 ± 0.95 mmHg from zero to maximal Impella flow was not significant (p = 0.68)), confirming applicability of the human Pmsa equation for an ovine LVAD model. The study opens new directions for future translational and human investigations of fluid management using Pmsa for patients with temporary LVADs.

Background: Whilst a combination of genetically mediated vulnerability and hemodynamic insult is suspected to contribute to bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood.

Methods: Utilizing RT-qPCR, we compared the expression of 28 potentially relevant long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in aortic tissue from BAV patients undergoing aortic surgery for aortopathy, to healthy controls. Relative lncRNA expression was measured using ΔΔCT, with fold-change calculated as RQ=2^-ΔΔCT.

Results: When comparing samples from BAV patients (n=29, males n=25; median age 58 years, Q1-Q3 51-65, maximum aortic dimension 50±5 mm) with healthy controls (n=7; males n=4, P=.12; median age 39 years, Q1-Q3 18-47, P=.001), there were two differentially expressed lncRNA: TUG1 expression was significantly lower in BAV aortic tissue (RQ 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.69, P=.02), whilst MIAT expression was significantly higher (RQ 2.87, 95% CI 1.96-4.20, P=.01). Sensitivity analysis including only patients with normal BAV function showed similar trends of differential expression of TUG1 (RQ 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.90, P=.29) and MIAT (RQ 2.55, 95% CI 1.21-5.36, P=.29) compared to controls.

Conclusions: LncRNA TUG1 and MIAT are differentially expressed in BAV aortopathy compared to healthy controls, independent of BAV hemodynamics. Aberrant lncRNA expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of BAV aortopathy.