No abstract available
Systematic review and meta-analysis of mid-term survival, reoperation, and recurrent mitral regurgitation for robotic-assisted mitral valve repair
Background: Over the past two decades surgical approaches for mitral valve (MV) disease have evolved with the advent of minimally invasive techniques. Robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) safety and efficacy has been well documented, however, mid- to long-term data are limited. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the available mid- to long-term data for RMVr.
Methods: Electronic searches of five databases were performed to identify all relevant studies reporting minimum five-year data on RMVr. Pre-defined primary outcomes of interest were overall survival, freedom from MV reoperation and from moderate or worse mitral regurgitation (MR) at five years or more post-RMVr. A meta-analysis of proportions or means was performed, utilizing a random effects model, to present the data. Kaplan-Meier curves were aggregated using reconstructed individual patient data.
Results: Nine studies totaling 3,300 patients undergoing RMVr were identified. Rates of overall survival at 1-, 5- and 10-year were 99.2%, 97.4% and 92.3%, respectively. Freedom from MV reoperation at eight-years post RMVr was 95.0%. Freedom from moderate or worse MR at seven years was 86.0%. Rates of early post-operative complications were low with only 0.2% all-cause mortality and 1.0% cerebrovascular accident. Reoperation for bleeding was low at 2.2% and successful RMVr was 99.8%. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay were 22.4 hours and 5.2 days, respectively.
Conclusions: RMVr is a safe procedure with low rates of early mortality and other complications. It can be performed with low complication rates in high volume, experienced centers. Evaluation of available mid-term data post-RMVr suggests favorable rates of overall survival, freedom from MV reoperation and from moderate or worse MR recurrence.
Real-world postoperative outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer
No abstract available
Ross procedure in bicuspid aortic valve pathologies.
No abstract available
Robotically assisted mitral valve repair-the string, ruler, and bulldog technique.
Robotic mitral valve repair presents its own unique set of challenges. Neochordae implantation is one of the techniques used to achieve adequate repair of the mitral valve. Precise securing of neochordae is vital in achieving a meticulous repair. This article describes how to perform an efficient, reproducible robotic mitral valve repair using a string, a ruler, and a bulldog.
Iatrogenic Type A Aortic Dissection: Challenges and Frontiers-Contemporary Single Center Data and Clinical Perspective.
Iatrogenic aortic dissection (IAD) is a rare but devastating complication in cardiac surgery and related procedures. Due to its rarity, published data on emergency surgery following IAD are limited. Herein, we discuss IAD occurring intra- and postoperatively, including those occurring during transcatheter aortic valve replacement and cardiac catheterization, and present benchmark data from our consecutive, single-center experience. We demonstrate changes in patient characteristics, surgical approaches, and outcomes over a 23-year period.
Splitting the anterior mitral leaflet impairs left ventricular function in an ovine model
Objectives: During mitral valve replacement, the anterior mitral leaflet is usually resected or modified. Anterior leaflet splitting seems the least disruptive modification. Reattachment of the modified leaflet to the annulus reduces the annulopapillary distance. The goal of this study was to quantify the acute effects on left ventricular function of splitting the anterior mitral leaflet and shortening the annulopapillary distance.
Methods: In 6 adult sheep, a wire was placed around the anterior leaflet and exteriorized through the left ventricular wall to enable splitting the leaflet in the beating heart. Releasable snares to reduce annulopapillary distance were likewise positioned and exteriorized. A mechanical mitral prosthesis was inserted to prevent mitral incompetence during external manipulations of the native valve. Instantaneous changes in left ventricular function were recorded before and after shortening the annulopapillary distance, then before and after splitting the anterior leaflet.
Results: After splitting the anterior leaflet, preload recruitable stroke work, stroke work, stroke volume, cardiac output, left ventricular end systolic pressure and mean pressure were significantly decreased by 26%, 23%, 12%, 9%, 15% and 11%, respectively. Shortening the annulopapillary distance was associated with significant decreases in the end systolic pressure volume relationship, preload recruitable stroke work, stroke work and left ventricular end systolic pressure by 67%, 33%, 15% and 13%, respectively. Shortening the annulopapillary distance after splitting the leaflet had no significant effect.
Conclusions: Splitting the anterior mitral leaflet acutely impaired left ventricular contractility and haemodynamics in an ovine model. Shortening the annulopapillary distance after leaflet splitting did not further impair left ventricular function.
Coronary artery bypass surgery for acute coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of on-pump cardioplegic arrest, off-pump, and on-pump beating heart strategies
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome is a high-risk procedure, and the best strategy for myocardial revascularisation remains debated. This study compares the 30-day mortality benefit of on-pump CABG (ONCAB), off-pump CABG (OPCAB), and on-pump beating heart CABG (OnBHCAB) strategies.
Methods: A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted for studies comparing ONCAB with OPCAB or OnBHCAB in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared using a Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis (NMA). A random effects consistency model was applied, and direct and indirect comparisons were made to determine the relative effectiveness of each strategy on postoperative outcomes.
Results: One randomised controlled trial and eighteen observational studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified. A total of 4320, 5559, and 1962 patients underwent ONCAB, OPCAB, and OnBHCAB respectively. NMA showed that OPCAB had the highest probability of ranking as the most effective treatment in terms of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.23-1.00), followed by OnBHCAB (OR, 0.62; 95% CrI, 0.20-1.57), however the 95% CrI crossed or included unity. A subgroup NMA of nine studies assessing only acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients demonstrated a 72% reduction in likelihood of 30-day mortality after OPCAB (CrI, 0.07-0.83). No significant increase in rate of stroke, renal dysfunction or length of intensive care unit stay was found for either strategy.
Conclusions: Although no single best surgical revascularisation approach in ACS patients was identified, the significant mortality benefit with OPCAB seen with AMI suggests high acuity patients may benefit most from avoiding further myocardial injury associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.
Robotic versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery (RMVS) is becoming an increasingly performed procedure in cardiac surgery, however, its true safety and efficacy compared to the gold standard conventional sternotomy approach [conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery (CSMVS)] remains debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive analysis of all available literature comparing RMVS to CSMVS.
Methods: An electronic search of five databases was performed to identify all relevant studies comparing RMVS to CSMVS. Pre-defined primary outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and re-operation for bleeding. Secondary outcomes of interest included cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.
Results: The search strategy identified fourteen studies qualifying for inclusion in this meta-analysis comparing RMVS to CSMVS. The outcomes of 6,341 patients (2,804 RMVS and 3,537 CSMVS) were included. RMVS had significantly lower mortality when compared to CSMVS group in both the unmatched [odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.57; P<0.001] and matched cohorts (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.80; P=0.01). There was no significant difference in rates of CVA or re-operation for bleeding between the two groups in either the entire included cohort or matched patients. CSMVS had significantly shorter cross clamp time by 28 minutes (95% CI: 19.30-37.32; P<0.001) and CPB time by 49 minutes (95% CI: 36.16-61.01; P<0.001) which remained significantly shorter in the matched cohorts. RMVS had shorter ICU [mean difference (MD) 26 hours; 95% CI: -34.31 to -18.52; P<0.001] and hospital LOS (MD 2 days; 95% CI: -2.66 to -1.37; P<0.001), which were again both significantly shorter in the matched cohort. RMVS group also had fewer RBC transfusions (OR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28-0.70; P<0.001).
Conclusions: Current evidence on comparative outcomes of RMVS and CSMVS is limited with only low-quality studies currently available. This present meta-analysis suggests that RMVS may have lower mortality and shorter ICU and hospital LOS, however CSMVS may be associated with significantly shorter cross clamp and CPB times. Further analysis of high-quality studies with randomized data is required to verify these results
Pacemaker after Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Prostheses: A Progress Report from the SURD-IR
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the need for postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SuRD-AVR) in the context of a progress report from a large multicenter international registry (SURD-IR).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4,166 patients who underwent SuRD-AVR between 2008 and 2019. The primary outcome was the need for PPI before discharge. The study population was analyzed separately according to the implanted prostheses (Su cohort and RD cohort). Each cohort was divided into two groups based on the operation date: an early group (“EG” = 2008-2016) and a late group (“LG” = 2017-2019).
Results: The rate of PPI decreased significantly in the Su cohort over time (EG = 10.8% vs LG = 6.3%, p < 0.001). In the Su cohort, a decrease in age, risk profile, and incidence of bicuspid aortic valve, increased use of anterior right thoracotomy, reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass time and of associated procedures, and more frequent use of smaller prostheses were observed over time. In the RD cohort, the rate of PPI was stable over time (EG = 8.8% vs LG = 9.3%, p = 0.8). In this cohort, a younger age, lower risk profile, and higher incidence of concomitant septal myectomy were observed over time.
Conclusions: Our analysis showed a significant decrease in the PPI rate in patients who underwent Su-AVR over time. Patient selection as well as surgical improvements and a more accurate sizing could be correlated with this phenomenon. The RD cohort revealed no significant differences either in patient’s characteristics or in PPI rate between the two time periods.
